"Jenny Kuper (see footnote) states:

'Who is old enough to fight wars? The UN prefers to set a minimum age of 21 for its peace keeping forces. Yet most countries, including the US and the UK, employ soldiers from 18 upwards, in line with the current best practice standard in internationallaw.'

Even though Kuper is right to draw attention to the fact that soldiers from the US and UK are under the minimum age the UN employ for its peace keeping forces, she is wrong to say that the UK employs soldiers from 18 upward.

On signing the Optional Protocol in September 2000, the UK declared that it would "take all feasible measures to ensure that members of its armed forces who have not attained the age of 18 years do not take a direct part in hostilities". At that stage it still reserved the right to deploy under-18s and confirmed this on ratifying the protocol. However in February 2003 the UK stated that "It has been decided that the army will no longer routinely deploy soldiers under the age of 18 on any operations outside the UK, except where the operation is of a purely humanitarian nature and where no hostile forces are involved".

Nevertheless earlier this year UK Defence Minister Adam Ingram made the admission that fifteen British youngsters (four of them girls) have been deployed in Iraq since 2003.

This shows that the UK is clearly in breach of its obligations not only under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), but also various articles of at least two ILO Conventions (138 and 182) it has signed.

Not only that, the Celtic League have previously highlighted the issue, following concerns expressed by Plaid Cymru in Wales, that the MoD and particularly the British army have been targeting children from underprivileged backgrounds in an attempt to recruit them in to the armed forces.

The United Kingdom is one of only a few stateswhich target children for recruitment and it has given commitments to the United Nations under the Optional Protocol on the Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) that those recruited who are under eighteen will not be used in combat situations.

However, the Celtic League have been a long term campaigner on this very issue and have found that many assurances the British Defence Ministry give, in the end prove meaningless. "

The above comment has been submitted to the United Kingdom Guardian newspaper by Celtic League General Secretary, Rhisiart Tal-e-bot, following the publication by the paper of an article entitled "Old enough to go into battle, but still a child", (The Guardian Weekly November 16). A Special Report for Universal Children's Day by Jenny Kuper.

See also Celtic News articles at:

(voir le site) (voir le site) (voir le site) (voir le site) (voir le site) (voir le site)

J B Moffatt Director of Information Celtic League

21/11/07

• Emmanuel Grégoire et l’abbé Macron  par David Grosclaude le 23/11/2024
• Pays de Redon. La Bogue d’or, rendez-vous du « génie populaire » par Le blog de paul Molac le 05/11/2024
• Catherine Vautrin en Corse : Régions et Peuples Solidaires appelle l’Etat à enfin aboutir sur l'autonomie par RPS le 25/10/2024
• Gouvernement Barnier : des nominations inquiétantes par RPS le 24/09/2024
• Quelle future gouvernance en France ? par Marcel Berrou le 08/07/2024
• Après deux cycles de trois ans du Parlement de Bretagne réveillé, voici venir le troisième cycle ! par KAD le 01/07/2024
• Résolution pour la Réunification de la Bretagne à la XIXème Assemblée Générale de l'UNPO à Munich, les 11 et 12 mai 2024 : par KAD le 07/05/2024
• TER Nouvelle Aquitaine : quelle honte !   par David Grosclaude le 18/04/2024
• Les Braises de la Rencontre, le 5 mai 2024, sur le parc de sculptures mémorial de MAB Koad Sav Pell ! par MAB, Musée Archipel Breton le 16/04/2024
• Koun Breizh s’indigne : Non ! les festoù-noz ne sont pas des lieux réservés aux « attardés » ! par Koun Breizh - Bertaign Tenant - Mémoire-de-Bretagne le 07/01/2024